On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 02:23:56PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * ps/more-sign-compare (2024-12-27) 10 commits > - sign-compare: avoid comparing ptrdiff with an int/unsigned > - commit-reach: use `size_t` to track indices when computing merge bases > - shallow: fix -Wsign-compare warnings > - builtin/log: fix remaining -Wsign-compare warnings > - builtin/log: use `size_t` to track indices > - commit-reach: use `size_t` to track indices in `get_reachable_subset()` > - commit-reach: use `size_t` to track indices in `remove_redundant()` > - commit-reach: fix type of `min_commit_date` > - commit-reach: fix index used to loop through unsigned integer > - prio-queue: fix type of `insertion_ctr` > > More -Wsign-compare fixes. > > Expecting a reroll? > cf. <Z2-2dbYVuuLxpNmK@xxxxxx> > cf. https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2023/07/25/wsign-compare-is-garbage/ > source: <20241227-b4-pks-commit-reach-sign-compare-v1-0-07c59c2aa632@xxxxxx> There wasn't anything yet that needs addressing, unless I have missed something. Peff acked a couple of patches, and the questions from Jialuo have been addressed. So no rerolled is planney (yet). > * sk/maintenance-remote-prune (2024-12-28) 1 commit > - maintenance: add prune-remote-refs task > > A new periodic maintenance task to run "git remote prune" has been > introduced. > > Will merge to 'next'? > source: <pull.1838.v2.git.1735380461980.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> I've had another look at this series just now. > -------------------------------------------------- > [Cooking] > > * rs/reftable-realloc-errors (2024-12-28) 4 commits > - t-reftable-merged: handle realloc errors > - reftable: handle realloc error in parse_names() > - reftable: fix allocation count on realloc error > - reftable: avoid leaks on realloc error > > The custom allocator code in the reftable library did not handle > failing realloc() very well, which has been addressed. > > Will merge to 'next'? > source: <f4677194-0a3a-4f07-b003-c0295b51c100@xxxxxx> I'm not a 100% happy with the split for reallocators that this series introduces, but don't think that the series is to blame because it simply fixes the underlying problem. So this is a good first iteration and we can improve the status quo in a follow-up. So yes, I think this can be merged. Patrick
