On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 10:02:15AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > The short help text given by "git show-index -h" says > > $ git show-index -h > usage: git show-index [--object-format=<hash-algorithm>] > > --[no-]object-format <hash-algorithm> > specify the hash algorithm to use > > > The command takes a pack .idx file from its standard input. The > user has to _know_ this, as there is no indication from this output. > > Give a hint that the data to work on is fed from its standard input. > > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> Makes sense. > * I also found the option description somewhat funny in that > > (1) it makes it look like "--no-object-format sha256" is > accepted, which is not a case, and > > (2) "git show-index --no-object-format" already is a curious > thing to say; the command certainly needs to work in _some_ > format. > > But (2) is common to all the usual command line options to allow > defeating another instance of the same option that is given > positively previously on the command line (i.e. "git show-index > --object-format=sha256 --no-object-format" should behave as if no > object-format option was given), and (1) is shared by all the > other options that allow such override. So I'll let it pass, but > if we really wanted to improve it, the fix should go into how the > parse-options subsystem works. Can't we already fix this via OPT_NONEG? Or is your point rather that it is awkward in general and choices like this should never have a negated variant by default? > builtin/show-index.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git c/builtin/show-index.c w/builtin/show-index.c > index f164c01bbe..8678b741a4 100644 > --- c/builtin/show-index.c > +++ w/builtin/show-index.c > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ > #include "parse-options.h" > > static const char *const show_index_usage[] = { > - "git show-index [--object-format=<hash-algorithm>]", > + "git show-index [--object-format=<hash-algorithm>] < <pack-idx-file>", > NULL > }; I was wondering whether we have any other usage strings that show an expected stdin like this, and indeed we do. The usage string in "builtin/mailinfo.c" uses different syntax though without the angular brackets, but "builtin/pack-objects.c" does use them. I think with the angular brackets is more idiomatic in our codebase though, so the addition looks good to me. Patrick