On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 11:46:27AM +0100, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
[snip]
> @@ -717,14 +715,14 @@ static int show_tag_object(const struct object_id *oid, struct rev_info *rev)
> unsigned long size;
> enum object_type type;
> char *buf = repo_read_object_file(the_repository, oid, &type, &size);
> - int offset = 0;
> + unsigned long offset = 0;
Why here we use `unsigned long`, is this a special situation where we
cannot use `size_t`?
>
> if (!buf)
> return error(_("could not read object %s"), oid_to_hex(oid));
>
> assert(type == OBJ_TAG);
> while (offset < size && buf[offset] != '\n') {
> - int new_offset = offset + 1;
> + unsigned long new_offset = offset + 1;
> const char *ident;
> while (new_offset < size && buf[new_offset++] != '\n')
> ; /* do nothing */
> @@ -2183,7 +2182,7 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc,
> fmt_patch_suffix = cfg.fmt_patch_suffix;
>
> /* Make sure "0000-$sub.patch" gives non-negative length for $sub */
> - if (cfg.log.fmt_patch_name_max <= strlen("0000-") + strlen(fmt_patch_suffix))
> + if (cfg.log.fmt_patch_name_max <= cast_size_t_to_int(strlen("0000-") + strlen(fmt_patch_suffix)))
A design question, why we don't change the type of
`cfg.log.fmt_patch_name_max` to be `size_t`?
> cfg.log.fmt_patch_name_max = strlen("0000-") + strlen(fmt_patch_suffix);
>
> if (cover_from_description_arg)
>
> --
> 2.48.0.rc0.184.g0fc57dec57.dirty
>
Thanks,
Jialuo
