On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 01:17:15PM -0500, rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On December 22, 2024 12:48 PM, I wrote: > >On December 21, 2024 1:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >>To: rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>Cc: 'Patrick Steinhardt' <ps@xxxxxx>; git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Randall S. > Becker' > >><randall.becker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] reftable/stack: fix zero-sized allocation when > >>there are no readers > >> > >><rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >>>>Applying these on the author-supplied base (ff795a5c5e) yields the > >>>>same > >>> tree as > >>>>the result of merging my manual application of these four patches to > >>> ps/reftable- > >>>>alloc-failures into the same base. > >>> > >>> Ready to test this. Please let me know when and I will report results. > >> > >>If you want to start sooner > >> > >> $ git checkout -b test ff795a5c5ed2e2d07c688c217a615d89e3f5733b > >> $ git am ... these four patches ... > >> > >>should give you the fix without anything else mixed in. I'll push out > >>the usual four branches after integration testing, but it will be > >>queued in 'seen' (just above the point that corresponds to > >>'next') first, before merging it to 'next' (and then down to 'master' > before -rc1). > > > >FYI: 'seen' looks better now. I am having issues in t0211-trace2-perf.sh > with > >undefined SSL symbols (SSL_get0_group_name), but am able to use git init > again. > > 'seen' looks good. Operator error on trace2-perf.sh - used the wrong version > of OpenSSL. Thanks for confirming! Patrick