On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 02:22:38PM +0100, Seyi Chamber wrote: > On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 at 08:23, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 11:37:23AM +0100, Seyi Chamber wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > I just published a new blog post on unit test scripts I've selected > > > and prioritized for initial conversion to clar. I would love for you > > > to check it out and share your opinion! > > > > > > Find the link here: > > > https://seyi-kuforiji-902b48.gitlab.io/posts/week-2-prioritizing-test-scripts > > > > Thanks for the blog post! The initial selection looks reasonable to me. > > I was wondering whether it would make sense to evict "t-reftable-tree.c" > > out of the first batch and then handle all reftable-related tests in a > > single patch series. But we've got 9 of those, some of which are quite > > complex, so that patch series would become quite large overall. So I > > guess it's sensible to distribute the conversion of the reftable tests > > across different patch series. > > > > Patrick > > I suppose I could still make that work if that's your recommendation. > I could divide the reftable-related tests into two sets and then treat > them together. What do you think? I'll leave it up to you, as there is no "right" or "wrong" in this context. Patrick
