Re: remote.<name>.push without dst doesn't behave as documented

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: remote.<name>.push without dst doesn't behave as documented
From: Yuri Kanivetsky <yuri.kanivetsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:48:15 +0200
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAMhVC3byz89UP_DJq+c6UVUNoFW0oRRSwbR7v=uUBAdBMLwqMg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMhVC3b+1TWLkKGYVb6VyBRyQjsDpbKRQQNT8SUXSmrWHfPnEQ@mail.gmail.com> <xmqqr0674hvq.fsf@gitster.g> <CAMhVC3byz89UP_DJq+c6UVUNoFW0oRRSwbR7v=uUBAdBMLwqMg@mail.gmail.com>

I guess I need to add, that I hoped that the beginning would be taken
as a joke. If it wasn't the case, then sorry :( I didn't mean to
offend anyone.

Regards,
Yuri

References:
- remote.<name>.push without dst doesn't behave as documented
  - From: Yuri Kanivetsky
- Re: remote.<name>.push without dst doesn't behave as documented
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- Re: remote.<name>.push without dst doesn't behave as documented
  - From: Yuri Kanivetsky

Prev by Date: git gc does not clean tmp_pack* files
Next by Date: Re: git gc does not clean tmp_pack* files
Previous by thread: Re: remote.<name>.push without dst doesn't behave as documented
Next by thread: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.48.0-rc0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux