Re: OK to submit l10n PR with signed commits?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 06:49:39AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > So I'm interested in GPG-sign my commits (that is, ``git commit -S``) for l10n
> > pull request (which I should submit in this cycle). Is it OK to do that?
> > Drawbacks?
> 
> Instead of talking first about drawbacks, we should consider the
> upsides.  Why would we even want to see your GPG signature, when
> most of us do not even have your GPG public key in our keychains?
> 
> What are we trying to achieve by doing this?

Just to ensure that PR commits are really from the respective authors.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux