Re: [PATCH] Improved and extended t5404

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:10:48PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

> > This one is on top of what is in next. It also include the check for
> > deleting remote braches I sent before. Regarding this one: if a remote
> > branch is deleted, shouldn't the matching tracking branch be removed
> > as well? The code in master seem to do that.
> 
> Yes, it should (the code in update_tracking_ref seems to handle that
> case, but I haven't tested, so I may have bungled something). I am
> literally walking out the door, now, though, so I will be out of touch
> for at least a day.

After I became disconnected, I looked at my 'next', and the reason for
the failure to delete the ref seems to be your is_null_sha1
error-checking patch, which Junio put in next. But maybe you have
figured that out in the intervening time. :)

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux