Re: [PATCH] Fix Solaris Workshop Compiler issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx> writes:

> ...  I am pretty sure I have seen size calculations in
> the deltifying code that would break badly using FLEX_ARRAY=1.  So _IFF_
> -DFLEX_ARRAY=1 is supposed to be necessary for some compilers, I could
> try seeing whether I find those locations again.

I do recall that I received a patch with an explicit member
elem[1] that is in fact used as a flexible array, foolishly
converted it to use FLEX_ARRAY and saw it mysteriously fail, and
realized what it was doing and reverted my changes, and applied
the patch as received.  IIRC it all happened before I pushed the
results out.  I unfortunately do not recall which area the patch
was about.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux