karthik nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I was reading the reftable code and noticed it. So mostly luck. Agreed > with what you're saying, I'd say this is mostly a 'safeguard'. I was wondering as well, thanks for that info. > Totally, these kind of specific changes are perfect for unit-tests. Plus > it was very simple to add one too. I appreciate you're doing this, that makes it easier to reason about these changes. >> Will queue. Thanks. Junio, thank you for the quick turnarond on this patch. For what it's worth, I've given this a review and I approve these changes. -- Toon
