Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Copying and pasting the diagram for reference: > > C S > \ / > O > > I looked into this and I don't think that making O, C, and S have the > same tree will make this fix testable. If they all had the same tree, > whether we check S's tree or not doesn't matter, since that tree is > already in a promisor pack (O and its tree was previously fetched from > the promisor remote, and thus is in a promisor pack). (We are checking > trees in order to repack them into promisor packs if necessary.) I see; thanks.
