Re: [PATCH 0/11] Miscellaneous MinGW port fallout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> 
> >> > This is a series of smallish, unrelated changes that were necessary
> >> > for the MinGW port.
> >> 
> >> I was _VERY_ afraid of reviewing this series.
> >
> > Why?  Because we get closer to MinGW integration into git.git for real? 
> > ;-)
> 
> I know you know me better than that.
> 
> Conversion from "Too UNIXy" stuff into another form that "claims to" run 
> on a different platform that I do not have a good way of testing myself?  
> I should feel scared, even if I can always punt and say "I'll only make 
> sure UNIX side does not regress, Windose, who cares" ;-).

Yes, I do know you better than that. But I guess git grows up, and there 
is no way that you can guarantee it to perform well everywhere.

But I know some people who will make sure that it works on Windows.  For 
them, at least. ;-)

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux