On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:42:03AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I actually prefer "head" here. On something like: > > > > A--B--C > > / > > o--o--o > > \ > > o--o--o > > > > > > The term "branch" could be used to refer to the whole line of > > development consisting of A, B, and C. The term "head", on the other > > hand, refers to either C or a ref that points to it. We also use the > > terms "branch head" or just "branch" for that case, but I think "head" > > is more precise. > > > >> +This lists the commits reachable from the previous version of the branch. > >> +This syntax can be used with any git command that accepts a commit, > >> not just with git log. Some other examples: > > > > (Otherwise looks fine, thanks!) > > Oops, I think I skipped the hunk #2 and applied hunk #3. Will > fix-up with: OK, thanks Junio! --b. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
