On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 03:46:32PM +0300, Sergei Organov wrote: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Sergei Organov <osv@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> Signed-off-by: Sergei Organov <osv@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> Documentation/user-manual.txt | 8 ++++---- > >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt > >> index d99adc6..a169ef0 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt > >> +++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt > >> @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ Bisecting: 3537 revisions left to test after this > >> If you run "git branch" at this point, you'll see that git has > >> temporarily moved you to a new branch named "bisect". This branch > >> points to a commit (with commit id 65934...) that is reachable from > >> -v2.6.19 but not from v2.6.18. Compile and test it, and see whether > >> +"master" but not from v2.6.18. Compile and test it, and see whether > >> it crashes. Assume it does crash. Then: > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------- > > > > Thanks. > > > > This hunk and the last hunk I do not have any problem with. > > > >> @@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ If you make a commit that you later wish you hadn't, there are two > >> fundamentally different ways to fix the problem: > >> > >> 1. You can create a new commit that undoes whatever was done > >> - by the previous commit. This is the correct thing if your > >> + by the old commit. This is the correct thing if your > >> mistake has already been made public. > >> > >> 2. You can go back and modify the old commit. You should > > > > But is this an improvement or just a churn? > > I believe this is an improvement. It's more precise. With this change > it's crystal clear that both (1) and (2) above mean the same commit by > calling it "the old commit". Before the change, when I read this the > first time, I've got the term "previous" here literally, i.e., as the > last commit made, and I thought that if the commit in question is the > last one, I should do (1), otherwise -- (2). This confusion admittedly > vanished rather quickly, but it did happen. I think it's a good fix, yes, thanks.--b. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html