Re: Cloning empty repositories, was Re: What is the idea for bare repositories?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Sergei Organov wrote:
>
>> Just a wild idea. Doesn't it make sense to introduce perfect ultimate
>> common ancestor of the universe, probably calling it "the NULL commit"?
>> At first glance it seems that it can help to avoid corner cases
>> automagically.
>
> No. Sometimes you want unrelated branches in repository ('html', 'man',
> 'todo' branches in git.git), sometimes multiple roots are natural (merging
> in a project, like git-mailtools, gitweb, gitk, git-gui in git.git).

Sorry, I fail to see how does it interfere with the idea of the NULL
commit. What if  "unrelated" is defined as "the only common
ancestor is the NULL commit"?

Anyway, I'm not going do defend the idea further. I just recalled I
heard about it somewhere, probably in Bazaar-NG, and I thought I'd
mention it here as it appeared very natural to me.

-- 
Sergei.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux