Re: Detecting squash-merged branches (and question about git-diff-tree)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 3, 2024, at 16:51, Max Gautier wrote:
>> My program tries to be like a for-each-ref for merged etc. refs.
>> More focused on reporting first since that can then be used for
>> deletion or whatever else.
>
> Hum, I'm wondering why it didn't find this earlier, I did search though.
> It apparently use git commit-tree to create a temporary commit, and git
> cherry on that to check if it's in the target branch.
> I wonder if this wouldn't cause problems in case of conflicts though,
> during the git commit-tree process ?

Maybe, I haven’t tried.  But using something that creates a commit in
the DB seems a bit unnecessary/excessive in any case.

Your diff approach seems more direct.

-- 
Kristoffer Haugsbakk






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux