Re: [PATCH 0/3] Performance improvements for repacking non-promisor objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> When merged to 'seen', this seems to break quite a many tests, all
>> related to "pack".
>>
>> I haven't tried running tests on the topic stand-alone.
>
> Ah, sorry for a false alarm.  The breakage may be coming from some
> other topic.  Haven't figured out which one yet.

Sorry for a double false alarm.  The breakages are due to this
topic.  These do not break without this topic in 'seen', and do
break with this topic in 'seen'.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux