On December 2, 2024 8:46 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Unfortunately, I haven't had time lately to follow all these >> worktree-related changes or discussions, but perhaps shejialuo is >> referring to the ability, from within one worktree, to mention a ref >> from another worktree (which is a feature Duy added some time after >> the initial worktree implementation). > >Ah, yes, that exposes (and has to expose) the worktree ID. It still does not have to >be unique across repositories (only has to unique among the worktrees that share >the same single repository). I might be mistaken, but I think the intent of the worktree series being discussed deliberately wanted the worktree ID to be globally unique on a specific machine. I might be wrong (hoping I am). The original author should comment on this.
