Re: [PATCH 3/4] t5604: do not expect that HEAD is a valid tagname

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] t5604: do not expect that HEAD is a valid tagname
From: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 13:19:56 +0100
Cc: git@xxxxxxxx, "Jeff King" <peff@xxxxxxxx>
Feedback-id: i8b11424c:Fastmail
In-reply-to: <20241202070714.3028549-4-gitster@pobox.com>
References: <20241202070714.3028549-1-gitster@pobox.com> <20241202070714.3028549-4-gitster@pobox.com>

On Mon, Dec 2, 2024, at 08:07, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 09116a1c (refs: loosen over-strict "format" check, 2011-11-16)

Nit/confusion: the abbreviated hash is only eight hexes long.  I’m used to it
being 11 for this project?

Does the age of the commit matter?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] t5604: do not expect that HEAD is a valid tagname
  - From: Jeff King

References:
- [PATCH 0/4] forbid HEAD as a tagname
  - From: Junio C Hamano
- [PATCH 3/4] t5604: do not expect that HEAD is a valid tagname
  - From: Junio C Hamano

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2 13/14] scalar: address -Wsign-compare warnings
Next by Date: [PATCH v2 01/14] git-compat-util: introduce macros to disable "-Wsign-compare" warnings
Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/4] t5604: do not expect that HEAD is a valid tagname
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/4] t5604: do not expect that HEAD is a valid tagname
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux