On Fri Nov 29, 2024 at 5:17 PM CST, rsbecker wrote: > On November 29, 2024 6:14 PM, Caleb White writes: >>On Fri Nov 29, 2024 at 4:54 PM CST, rsbecker wrote: >>> General comment on this series: Is there a mechanism of preserving >>> existing functionality for those of us who have existing scripts that >>> depend on the existing branch and worktree naming? >> >>Existing worktrees will continue to work as they do now. The only change is the >>worktree id for new worktrees. However, there's not an option to preserve the >>existing behavior for new worktrees (nor do I think there should be). > > I do not agree. Companies that have existing scripts should have some way to > preserve their investment. Just saying "No more worktrees for you" is not > really considerate. How exactly are your scripts depending on the worktree id? There are very few reasons a script might need to know the worktree id, and I suspect that there's some confusion here. The worktree name is still used with the `git worktree` commands, so there no change on that front. Best, Caleb
