Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > So here's the series I came up with, which starts by adjusting the tests > to be resilient to the later changes, but also to show the existing > failure mode. > > And then the rest of the patches add the performance improvements we've > been discussing in the thread. So, this did not get any comments, but I had a time to read it over, and did not find anything suspicious in there. Let me mark it for 'next', this time for real, in the What's cooking draft I have. Thanks.
