On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:42:29AM +0100, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024, at 08:51, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > While we generally cannot avoid the first check, the second check is > > superfluous in cases where the transaction is an initial one in an > > otherwise empty ref store. The check results in multiple ref reads as > > well as the creation of a ref iterator for every ref we're checking, > > which adds up quite fast when performing the check for many refs. > > > > Introduce a new flag that allows us to skip this check and wire it up in > > such that the backends pass it when running an initial transaction. This > > Missing word? “wire it up in such that”. > > Maybe: “wire it up so that”. Ah, indeed. Will fix. Thanks! Patrick
