On Friday, November 22nd, 2024 at 10:44, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 20/11/2024 05:20, Caleb White wrote: > > Originally this function was called inside an `if` statement, however, > > another topic extracted the call to a separate line and so this return > > was no longer used. I decided to keep the return anyway in case it was > > useful in the future. > > If we don't use the return value I'd be inclined to leave it as is. This is being changed in response to feedback on the previous topic (which was merged a bit too prematurely). I would prefer to leave these changes in if that's alright to respect the previous reviewers and given that I've already made the changes. Best, Caleb
