Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > One topic I did not see is [1], which appeared not to be picked up in > this or the last cycle. That topic has been reviewed and should be in > good shape. I think the thread died down after agreeing on some > potentially interesting future improvements we could make, but I don't > think there were any outstanding issues with the current patches. I didn't get the impression that there was a general concensus that it was a good implementation, but perhaps I am misremembering things. These two patches touch only the test helpers, but I am wondering if it becomes easier to implement on top of your later changes that allows the production side to also access the unsafe variant of the algorithm? Thanks.
