Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 05:49:34PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * ps/gc-stale-lock-warning (2024-11-20) 1 commit > ... > I'm never quite sure whether I should speak of the command or the code > unit in this edge case, but this message here seems to indicate that it > would be preferable to mention the actual command instead. Either is probably fine, but when the commit describes a fix or an update to an end-user observable behaviour, the command name would make a better label to appear in "git shortlog". >> * ps/send-pack-unhide-error-in-atomic-push (2024-11-15) 6 commits > ... > I'll review this patch series later this week. Thanks. >> * ps/leakfixes-part-10 (2024-11-13) 28 commits >> ... >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: <20241111-b4-pks-leak-fixes-pt10-v2-0-6154bf91f0b0@xxxxxx> > > Toon left another comment that I'll want to have a look at before > merging this to "next". I guess we now have a hopefully final reroll, which I saw and picked up. >> * ds/path-walk-1 (2024-11-11) 6 commits >> - path-walk: mark trees and blobs as UNINTERESTING >> - path-walk: visit tags and cached objects >> - path-walk: allow consumer to specify object types >> - t6601: add helper for testing path-walk API >> - test-lib-functions: add test_cmp_sorted >> - path-walk: introduce an object walk by path >> >> Introduce a new API to visit objects in batches based on a common >> path, or by type. >> >> Comments? >> source: <pull.1818.v2.git.1731181272.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> > > I think what's interesting in this case is the incompatibility between > the path-walk API and bitmaps. It seems like there is some push back > based on this, but from my point of view the path-walk API still has > uses where bitmaps don't matter that much, like in the proposed new > git-backfill and git-survey tools. Both of which are of interest to me. Yup, I didn't have a chance to carefully read what the new code does yet, and didn't get an impression that anybody did either for v1 or v2, but I may be mistaken. >> * cc/promisor-remote-capability (2024-09-10) 4 commits > ... > Chris is currently writing such a doc that tries to clarify the bigger > picture. So I guess we can evict this topic for now, start to discuss > the vision and then once we're all on the same page start to think > re-submit the topic. > > I've Cc'd him in case he disagrees with me. Then I'll wait for Christian to speak up. >> * sj/ref-contents-check (2024-11-15) 9 commits >> ... > I've already reviewed this version and expect a (probably final) reroll. Thanks, I saw that (hopefully) final reroll and picked it up. Thanks.
