"Bence Ferdinandy" <bence@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Since this particular test just wants to test what happens if
> `refs_update_symref_extended` returns with 1 and not testing correct behaviour
> of backends and such, would it be acceptable if this particular test case would
> check for the backend and if it is reftables it will just pass without actually
> checking and do the manually locking thing above for the files backend?
I think we have some pre-made test prerequisite to skip tests unless
run with a particular ref backend, exactly for that. Perhaps
test_expect_success REFFILES 'block update to check error' '
... manually block update and see how the operation
... errors out
'
or something?
