Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] midx-write: pass down repository to static functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:36:41PM +0100, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> ---
>  midx-write.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

This patch all seems reasonable to me. When reviewing it in this way, it
is a little unclear to see which functions need just a repository, just
a hash_algo, or the whole write_midx_context structure.

I think I might have erred on the side of just passing the
write_midx_context structure throughout the midx-write.c internals. That
exposes more of the implementation details than is strictly necessary,
but it does so to the benefit of making the code (and this patch) easier
to follow.

I don't feel strongly about it, and I trust that you modified the right
functions to pass the right data. I just wanted to mention it in case
you hadn't considered an alternative way to structure this patch.

Thanks,
Taylor




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux