Re: [PATCH 0/11] Miscellaneous MinGW port fallout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>> On Tuesday 13 November 2007 22:10, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> > Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > > On Tuesday 13 November 2007 21:04, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>> > > ... and so allow that the compiled binaries are installed in any
>> > > directory that the user chooses.
>> >
>> > If you can do that without breaking the tests (specifically, the
>> > test script should pick up the version of git you just built,
>> > not from /usr/bin nor /usr/local/stow/git/bin) that would be
>> > great.
>> 
>> Sorry, I don't understand your statement. Do you see any tests breaking?
>
> I guess what Junio is getting at: if your changes could lead to our not 
> needing to hard code defaults, that would be awesome.

Yes.  Another thing I said was that it would be grave regression
for testability if the change leads git to look at somewhere
else other than it was told to look via GIT_EXEC_PATH
environment,
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux