Peijian Ju <eric.peijian@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 1:48 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: >> >> > While having a quarantine directory would help with the case where you >> > have differing end user behaviour depending on the protocol, it of >> > course wouldn't help with the implied performance hit when using the >> > fallback logic. >> > >> > So maybe not having the fallback is the best solution after all, and >> > when users have a good use case for why they need it we could implement >> > it in a future iteration. >> >> And I would strongly suspect that we won't have to implement any >> fallback---hopefully folks upgrade their server side to be capable >> of whatever capability is needed fast enough ;-). >> >> Thanks. > > Thank you, sir, and also Patrick and Christian, for helping clarify > this for me. That makes sense. I will remove the "fetch and inspect" > approach in the next series. Thanks, everybody. And thank you for working on this topic.