Re: [PATCH 1/8] builtin: pass repository to sub commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 08:49:35PM +0800, shejialuo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 02:42:14PM +0100, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > diff --git a/t/helper/test-parse-options.c b/t/helper/test-parse-options.c
> > index 5250913d99eba18a28878d3904cb7b2399670d02..e5b1fe287e3ec94f0d8a3a99adb68842d52992f6 100644
> > --- a/t/helper/test-parse-options.c
> > +++ b/t/helper/test-parse-options.c
> > @@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
> > +#define USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE
> > +
> >  #include "test-tool.h"
> >  #include "parse-options.h"
> >  #include "strbuf.h"
> >  #include "string-list.h"
> >  #include "trace2.h"
> > +#include "repository.h"
> >  
> >  static int boolean = 0;
> >  static int integer = 0;
> > @@ -282,14 +285,16 @@ int cmd__parse_options_flags(int argc, const char **argv)
> >  	return parse_options_flags__cmd(argc, argv, test_flags);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int subcmd_one(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix UNUSED)
> > +static int subcmd_one(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix UNUSED,
> > +		      struct repository *repo UNUSED)
> >  {
> >  	printf("fn: subcmd_one\n");
> >  	print_args(argc, argv);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int subcmd_two(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix UNUSED)
> > +static int subcmd_two(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix UNUSED,
> > +		      struct repository *repo UNUSED)
> >  {
> >  	printf("fn: subcmd_two\n");
> >  	print_args(argc, argv);
> > @@ -319,7 +324,7 @@ static int parse_subcommand__cmd(int argc, const char **argv,
> >  
> >  	printf("opt: %d\n", opt);
> >  
> > -	return fn(argc, argv, NULL);
> > +	return fn(argc, argv, NULL, the_repository);
> 
> Do we need to pass the real "the_repository" variable here. From my
> understanding, we could just pass `NULL` to avoid including the
> "repository.h" and the macro. However, I am not familiar with the
> "test-tool" helper. It my comment was wrong, please ignore.

It certainly is surprising. If this really is required I'd expect an
explanation in the commit message.

Patrick




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux