Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] maintenance: separate parallelism safe and unsafe tasks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Calvin Wan <calvinwan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> .... I think for now it makes sense to hold off
> on rerolling this series (at least in the form of auto
> backgrounding/foregrounding tasks) since the purported benefits
> currently aren't worth the churn. Thanks again for the comments on
> this series

So, we'll place this topic on hold, or even eject from the tree to
be revisited later?

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux