"Usman Akinyemi via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: [jc: As Phillip is blamed for suggesting this addition, I added him to the recipient of this message.] > From: Usman Akinyemi <usmanakinyemi202@xxxxxxxxx> > > Modify the conflict resolution between tab-in-indent and > indent-with-non-tab to issue a warning instead of terminating > the operation with `die()`. Update the `git diff --check` test to > capture and verify the warning message output. > > Suggested-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Usman Akinyemi <usmanakinyemi202@xxxxxxxxx> > --- If the settings requires an impossible way to use whitespaces, the settings is buggy, and it generally would be better to correct the setting before moving on. I am curious to know in what situations this new behaviour can be seen as an improvement. It may allow you to go on _without_ fixing such a broken setting, but how would it help the end user? If the user set both of these mutually-incompatible options A and B by mistake, but what the user really wanted to check for was A, picking just one of A or B arbitrarily and disabling it would not help, and disabling both would not help, either. But wouldn't the real source of the problem be that we are trying to demote die() to force the user to correct contradictiong setting into warning()? Thanks.
