"Philippe Blain via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > valid_tool () { > - setup_tool "$1" && return 0 > + setup_tool "$1" 2>/dev/null && return 0 > cmd=$(get_merge_tool_cmd "$1") > test -n "$cmd" > } As we are checking if a tool is valid, it is normal for setup_tool to fail when we are checking is not valid (aka "fails to get set up"). There is no need to show an error message for such a failure, as the callers of valid_tool would do so if they wish. OK. > setup_user_tool () { > merge_tool_cmd=$(get_merge_tool_cmd "$tool") > - test -n "$merge_tool_cmd" || return 1 > + if test -z "$merge_tool_cmd" > + then > + echo >&2 "error: ${TOOL_MODE}tool.$tool.cmd not set for tool '$tool'" > + return 1 > + fi There are only two callers of setup_user_tool, and one of them squelches this message by sending it to /dev/null. The error message composed here does not use anything that is unique to the function (in other words, $tool and ${TOOL_MODE} are available to its callers). I wonder if it is a better design to leave this one as-is, and instead show the error message from the other caller of setup_user_tool that does not squelch the message? Are we planning to add more callers of this function that want to show the same message? > diff_cmd () { > ( eval $merge_tool_cmd ) > @@ -255,7 +259,7 @@ setup_tool () { > > # Now let the user override the default command for the tool. If > # they have not done so then this will return 1 which we ignore. > - setup_user_tool > + setup_user_tool 2>/dev/null If we did that, then this change can be dropped. Instead, a few lines above this hunk, we can give the error message ourselves from this setup_tool function. > if ! list_tool_variants | grep -q "^$tool$" > then > diff --git a/t/t7610-mergetool.sh b/t/t7610-mergetool.sh > index 22b3a85b3e9..82a88107850 100755 > --- a/t/t7610-mergetool.sh > +++ b/t/t7610-mergetool.sh > @@ -898,4 +898,12 @@ test_expect_success 'mergetool with guiDefault' ' > git commit -m "branch1 resolved with mergetool" > ' > > +test_expect_success 'mergetool with non-existent tool' ' > + test_when_finished "git reset --hard" && > + git checkout -b test$test_count branch1 && > + test_must_fail git merge main && > + yes "" | test_must_fail git mergetool --tool=absent >out 2>&1 && > + test_grep -i "not set for tool" out > +' Why "-i"? I do not offhand see the reason why we want to be loose here. The "${TOOL_MODE}tool" part may also want to be verified, perhaps, which was related to the topic of the fix in [2/5]?