Jean-Noël Avila <jean-noel.avila@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> This does slightly more than converting to new style, though, >> doesn't it? Is it so annoying to see a link that points at the same >> page you are reading right now to warrant duplicating some docs with >> conditional inclusion? > ... > This was already performed for git-clone (ebb55042a4) and git-init > (e7b3a7683c). Should it be separated in a dedicated commit? My comment came primarily as a reaction to seeing this change that was not part of what the proposed log message said. As you say, as a separate and orthogonal thing, we could make it a separate commit. But it also is perfectly fine if the log message explained that we are doing this independent change "while we are at it". Thanks.
