Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] doc: git-diff: apply format changes to diff-options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@xxxxxxx> writes:

>>> +`-U<n>`::
>>> +`--unified=<n>`::
>>> +	Generate diffs with _<n>_ lines of context instead of
>> 
>> Understandable.  Shouldn't <n> part be italicised?
>
> No need: the processing of back tick quotes already treats each part
> according to its semantics and applies the corresponding format.

Yup, you reminded me of how `the backticks are much more clever
these days` thing works.  Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux