On Wed Nov 06, 2024 at 01:19, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The "manual" to run the project on the maintainer side has this: > > - If a topic that was picked up to 'seen' becomes and stays > inactive for 3 calendar weeks without having seen a clear > consensus that it is good enough to be moved to 'next', the > topic may be discarded from 'seen'. Interested parties are > still free to revive the topic. For the purpose of this > guideline, the definition of being "inactive" is that nobody > has discussed the topic, no new iteration of the topic was > posted, and no responses to the review comments were given. > > If the topic has been updated large-ish-ly since the previous > rounds, it may deserve a fresh review, or the reviewers of the > previous rounds may find it sufficient that they judge based on the > change since the previous round (assuming that the earlier reviews > did a good job of hunting problems in the previous rounds). I do > not offhand know who read the topic and how big a course-change the > topic took during my absense, so hopefully somebody who is more > familiar with the latest round can chime in before I dig the topic > out from the bottom of my pile of backlog. Thanks for the info, I'll wait then or maybe write a followup on the patch's thread sometime next week, where the previous reviewers are already CC-d. Thanks, Bence
