On 11/4/24 6:39 PM, Jonathan Tan wrote:
Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
The biggest question I'd like to ask is this: do you see a risk of
a path being repeated? There are cases where it will happen, such as
indexed objects that are not reachable anywhere else.
I was thinking that the whole point of this feature is that we group
objects by path, so it seems desirable to test that paths are not
repeated. (Or repeated as little as possible, if it is not possible
to avoid repetition e.g. in the case you describe.)
In addition to determining the order of the batches, it can be
helpful to demonstrate that we don't call the path_fn with an
empty batch! I discovered this while making the appropriate
changes today and putting the fixes in the right places.
Thanks,
-Stolee
