From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> As custom options are added to 'git pack-objects' and 'git repack' to adjust how compression is done, use this new performance test script to demonstrate their effectiveness in performance and size. The recently-added --full-name-hash option swaps the default name-hash algorithm with one that attempts to uniformly distribute the hashes based on the full path name instead of the last 16 characters. This has a dramatic effect on full repacks for repositories with many versions of most paths. It can have a negative impact on cases such as pushing a single change. This can be seen by running pt5313 on the open source fluentui repository [1]. Most commits will have this kind of output for the thin and big pack cases, though certain commits (such as [2]) will have problematic thin pack size for other reasons. [1] https://github.com/microsoft/fluentui [2] a637a06df05360ce5ff21420803f64608226a875 Checked out at the parent of [2], I see the following statistics: Test HEAD --------------------------------------------------------------------- 5313.2: thin pack 0.37(0.43+0.02) 5313.3: thin pack size 1.2M 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.06(0.09+0.02) 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 20.4K 5313.6: big pack 2.01(7.73+0.23) 5313.7: big pack size 20.3M 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 1.32(2.77+0.27) 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 19.9M 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 1.40(3.01+0.08) 5313.11: shallow pack size 34.4M 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 1.08(1.25+0.14) 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 35.4M 5313.14: repack 90.70(672.88+2.46) 5313.15: repack size 439.6M 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 18.53(123.41+2.53) 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 169.7M In this case, we see positive behaviors such as a significant shrink in the size of the thin pack and full repack. The big pack is slightly smaller with --full-name-hash than without. The shallow pack is slightly larger with --full-name-hash. In the case of the Git repository, these numbers show some of the issues with this approach: Test HEAD -------------------------------------------------------------------- 5313.2: thin pack 0.00(0.00+0.00) 5313.3: thin pack size 589 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.00(0.00+0.00) 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 14.9K 5313.6: big pack 2.07(3.57+0.17) 5313.7: big pack size 17.6M 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 2.00(3.07+0.19) 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 17.9M 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 1.41(2.23+0.06) 5313.11: shallow pack size 12.1M 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 1.22(1.66+0.04) 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 12.4M 5313.14: repack 15.75(89.29+1.54) 5313.15: repack size 126.4M 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 15.56(89.78+1.32) 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 126.0M The thin pack that simulates a push is much worse with --full-name-hash in this case. The name hash values are doing a lot to assist with delta bases, it seems. The big pack and shallow clone cases are slightly worse with the --full-name-hash option. Only the full repack gains some benefits in size. The results are similar with the nodejs/node repo: Test HEAD --------------------------------------------------------------------- 5313.2: thin pack 0.01(0.01+0.00) 5313.3: thin pack size 1.6K 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.01(0.00+0.00) 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 3.1K 5313.6: big pack 4.26(8.03+0.24) 5313.7: big pack size 56.0M 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 4.16(6.55+0.22) 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 56.2M 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 7.67(11.80+0.29) 5313.11: shallow pack size 104.6M 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 7.52(9.65+0.23) 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 105.9M 5313.14: repack 71.22(317.61+3.95) 5313.15: repack size 739.9M 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 48.85(267.02+3.72) 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 793.5M The Linux kernel repository was the initial target of the default name hash value, and its naming conventions are practically build to take the most advantage of the default name hash values: Test HEAD ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5313.2: thin pack 0.15(0.01+0.03) 5313.3: thin pack size 4.6K 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.03(0.02+0.01) 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 6.8K 5313.6: big pack 18.51(33.74+0.95) 5313.7: big pack size 201.1M 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 16.01(29.81+0.88) 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 202.1M 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 11.49(17.61+0.54) 5313.11: shallow pack size 269.2M 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 11.24(15.25+0.56) 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 269.8M 5313.14: repack 1001.25(2271.06+38.86) 5313.15: repack size 2.5G 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 625.75(1941.96+36.09) 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 2.6G Finally, an internal Javascript repo of moderate size shows significant gains when repacking with --full-name-hash due to it having many name hash collisions. However, it's worth noting that only the full repack case has enough improvement to be worth it. But the improvements are significant: 6.4 GB to 862 MB. Test HEAD -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5313.2: thin pack 0.03(0.02+0.00) 5313.3: thin pack size 1.2K 5313.4: thin pack with --full-name-hash 0.03(0.03+0.00) 5313.5: thin pack size with --full-name-hash 2.6K 5313.6: big pack 2.20(3.23+0.30) 5313.7: big pack size 130.7M 5313.8: big pack with --full-name-hash 2.33(3.17+0.34) 5313.9: big pack size with --full-name-hash 131.0M 5313.10: shallow fetch pack 3.56(6.02+0.32) 5313.11: shallow pack size 44.5M 5313.12: shallow pack with --full-name-hash 2.94(3.94+0.32) 5313.13: shallow pack size with --full-name-hash 45.3M 5313.14: repack 2435.22(12523.11+23.53) 5313.15: repack size 6.4G 5313.16: repack with --full-name-hash 473.25(1805.11+17.22) 5313.17: repack size with --full-name-hash 861.9M These tests demonstrate that it is important to be careful about which cases are best for using the --full-name-hash option. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> --- t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+) create mode 100755 t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh diff --git a/t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh b/t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh new file mode 100755 index 00000000000..dfa29695315 --- /dev/null +++ b/t/perf/p5313-pack-objects.sh @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='Tests pack performance using bitmaps' +. ./perf-lib.sh + +GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=0 +export GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK + +test_perf_large_repo + +test_expect_success 'create rev input' ' + cat >in-thin <<-EOF && + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) + EOF + + cat >in-big <<-EOF && + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + ^$(git rev-parse HEAD~1000) + EOF + + cat >in-shallow <<-EOF + $(git rev-parse HEAD) + --shallow $(git rev-parse HEAD) + EOF +' + +test_perf 'thin pack' ' + git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse <in-thin >out +' + +test_size 'thin pack size' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'thin pack with --full-name-hash' ' + git pack-objects --thin --stdout --revs --sparse --full-name-hash <in-thin >out +' + +test_size 'thin pack size with --full-name-hash' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'big pack' ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse <in-big >out +' + +test_size 'big pack size' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'big pack with --full-name-hash' ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --full-name-hash <in-big >out +' + +test_size 'big pack size with --full-name-hash' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'shallow fetch pack' ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow <in-shallow >out +' + +test_size 'shallow pack size' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'shallow pack with --full-name-hash' ' + git pack-objects --stdout --revs --sparse --shallow --full-name-hash <in-shallow >out +' + +test_size 'shallow pack size with --full-name-hash' ' + test_file_size out +' + +test_perf 'repack' ' + git repack -adf +' + +test_size 'repack size' ' + pack=$(ls .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack) && + test_file_size "$pack" +' + +test_perf 'repack with --full-name-hash' ' + git repack -adf --full-name-hash +' + +test_size 'repack size with --full-name-hash' ' + pack=$(ls .git/objects/pack/pack-*.pack) && + test_file_size "$pack" +' + +test_done -- gitgitgadget
