Re: [PATCH 4/2] Fix parent rewriting in --early-output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This solves the problem quite naturally, because any tree that hasn't been 
> parsed - or even if it *has* been parsed, but just hasn't gone through 
> the compare function - will then always be seen as "different" and thus 
> interesting.
>
> This fairly straight-forward patch seems to work. It *replaces* the 
> pervious "patch 4/2", and yes, Junio, I think you were very right to 
> complain about that one.
>
> How does this one feel?

I think this is very natural and I like it.

I did not complain but just said I was puzzled, but after
thinking about this a bit I probably should have ;-).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux