On Thu, Oct 31, 2024, at 17:30, Phillip Wood wrote: > The diff below shows a fix and a new test that fails without the > sequencer changes. The fix is based on master, so it might need > updating to go on top of Junio's series. The test could probably > be improved to use the existing setup. Thank you! That those lines apparently worked had kind of been bothering me. It’s nice to get some clarity on the issue. But shouldn’t there be a signoff somewhere if I am to incorporate that diff into the series? Or is the signoff implied? -- Kristoffer Haugsbakk
