[PATCH v2 3/3] Documentation/git-bundle.txt: discuss naïve backups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

It might be naïve to think that those who need this education would end
up here in the first place.  But I think it’s good to mention this
high-level concept here on a command which provides a backup strategy.

Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Notes (series):
    v2:
    • Fix gitfaq(7) link
    
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/git/ZxfhAAgNlbEq60VB@nand.local/#t
    v1:
    Correct mention of the section?  All-caps seems to be the convention.

 Documentation/git-bundle.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-bundle.txt b/Documentation/git-bundle.txt
index bce62bc8309..7bffd2e4a05 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-bundle.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-bundle.txt
@@ -319,6 +319,20 @@ You can also see what references it offers:
 $ git ls-remote mybundle
 ----------------
 
+DISCUSSION
+----------
+
+A naive way to make a full backup of a repository is to use something to
+the effect of `cp -a <repo> <destination>`.  This is discouraged since
+the repository could be written to during the copy operation.  In turn
+some files at `<destination>` could be corrupted.
+
+This is why it is recommended to use Git tooling for making repository
+backups, either with this command or with e.g. linkgit:git-clone[1].
+
+See also linkgit:gitfaq[7], section "TRANSFERS" for a discussion of the
+problems associated with file syncing across systems.
+
 FILE FORMAT
 -----------
 
-- 
2.46.1.641.g54e7913fcb6





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux