Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] packfile: pass down repository to `odb_pack_name`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 02:43:42PM +0100, Karthik Nayak wrote:

> diff --git a/builtin/fast-import.c b/builtin/fast-import.c
> index ffee7d3abd..f4892d7f37 100644
> --- a/builtin/fast-import.c
> +++ b/builtin/fast-import.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static char *keep_pack(const char *curr_index_name)
>  	struct strbuf name = STRBUF_INIT;
>  	int keep_fd;
>  
> -	odb_pack_name(&name, pack_data->hash, "keep");
> +	odb_pack_name(the_repository, &name, pack_data->hash, "keep");

Why not pack_data->repo here? It's always going to be set to
the_repository in this program, but I think minimizing the number of
references to it still has value.

> @@ -814,11 +814,11 @@ static char *keep_pack(const char *curr_index_name)
>  	if (close(keep_fd))
>  		die_errno("failed to write keep file");
>  
> -	odb_pack_name(&name, pack_data->hash, "pack");
> +	odb_pack_name(the_repository, &name, pack_data->hash, "pack");
>  	if (finalize_object_file(pack_data->pack_name, name.buf))
>  		die("cannot store pack file");
>  
> -	odb_pack_name(&name, pack_data->hash, "idx");
> +	odb_pack_name(the_repository, &name, pack_data->hash, "idx");

Likewise in both of these spots.

>  	if (finalize_object_file(curr_index_name, name.buf))
>  		die("cannot store index file");
>  	free((void *)curr_index_name);
> @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static void unkeep_all_packs(void)
>  
>  	for (k = 0; k < pack_id; k++) {
>  		struct packed_git *p = all_packs[k];
> -		odb_pack_name(&name, p->hash, "keep");
> +		odb_pack_name(p->repo, &name, p->hash, "keep");

This one does use p->repo. Good.

> diff --git a/builtin/index-pack.c b/builtin/index-pack.c
> index be2f99625e..eaefb41761 100644
> --- a/builtin/index-pack.c
> +++ b/builtin/index-pack.c
> @@ -1479,7 +1479,7 @@ static void write_special_file(const char *suffix, const char *msg,
>  	if (pack_name)
>  		filename = derive_filename(pack_name, "pack", suffix, &name_buf);
>  	else
> -		filename = odb_pack_name(&name_buf, hash, suffix);
> +		filename = odb_pack_name(the_repository, &name_buf, hash, suffix);
>  
>  	fd = odb_pack_keep(filename);
>  	if (fd < 0) {
> @@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ static void rename_tmp_packfile(const char **final_name,
>  {
>  	if (!*final_name || strcmp(*final_name, curr_name)) {
>  		if (!*final_name)
> -			*final_name = odb_pack_name(name, hash, ext);
> +			*final_name = odb_pack_name(the_repository, name, hash, ext);

These two don't have a packed_git, so they use their own repo. Makes
sense.

> -int cmd_pack_redundant(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix UNUSED, struct repository *repo UNUSED) {
> +int cmd_pack_redundant(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix UNUSED, struct repository *repo) {
>  	int i; int i_still_use_this = 0; struct pack_list *min = NULL, *red, *pl;
>  	struct llist *ignore;
>  	struct strbuf idx_name = STRBUF_INIT;
> @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ int cmd_pack_redundant(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix UNUSED, s
>  	pl = red = pack_list_difference(local_packs, min);
>  	while (pl) {
>  		printf("%s\n%s\n",
> -		       odb_pack_name(&idx_name, pl->pack->hash, "idx"),
> +		       odb_pack_name(repo, &idx_name, pl->pack->hash, "idx"),
>  		       pl->pack->pack_name);
>  		pl = pl->next;
>  	}

This one is using the "repo" variable passed to the main function. That
seems a little sketchy to me philosophically, though, because these
packs all came from a call to get_all_packs(the_repository). I think
the two will always be the same, but it feels like we should be using
pl->pack->repo here for consistency.

> diff --git a/http.c b/http.c
> index 7e5be05207..50d8811cea 100644
> --- a/http.c
> +++ b/http.c
> @@ -2579,7 +2579,7 @@ struct http_pack_request *new_direct_http_pack_request(
>  
>  	preq->url = url;
>  
> -	odb_pack_name(&preq->tmpfile, packed_git_hash, "pack");
> +	odb_pack_name(the_repository, &preq->tmpfile, packed_git_hash, "pack");
>  	strbuf_addstr(&preq->tmpfile, ".temp");
>  	preq->packfile = fopen(preq->tmpfile.buf, "a");
>  	if (!preq->packfile) {

This one really ought to be using the packed_git we set up for the
matching idx file, but we won't have passed it through. And it's not
worth heavy refactoring just to get access to it, IMHO.


Earlier I mentioned that another helper could simplify many of these
sites a little. What I meant was this (on top of what's in your series):

diff --git a/builtin/fast-import.c b/builtin/fast-import.c
index 9056447bd0..976cb1d77b 100644
--- a/builtin/fast-import.c
+++ b/builtin/fast-import.c
@@ -806,19 +806,19 @@ static char *keep_pack(const char *curr_index_name)
 	struct strbuf name = STRBUF_INIT;
 	int keep_fd;
 
-	odb_pack_name(the_repository, &name, pack_data->hash, "keep");
+	pack_hashfile(pack_data, &name, "keep");
 	keep_fd = odb_pack_keep(name.buf);
 	if (keep_fd < 0)
 		die_errno("cannot create keep file");
 	write_or_die(keep_fd, keep_msg, strlen(keep_msg));
 	if (close(keep_fd))
 		die_errno("failed to write keep file");
 
-	odb_pack_name(the_repository, &name, pack_data->hash, "pack");
+	pack_hashfile(pack_data, &name, "pack");
 	if (finalize_object_file(pack_data->pack_name, name.buf))
 		die("cannot store pack file");
 
-	odb_pack_name(the_repository, &name, pack_data->hash, "idx");
+	pack_hashfile(pack_data, &name, "idx");
 	if (finalize_object_file(curr_index_name, name.buf))
 		die("cannot store index file");
 	free((void *)curr_index_name);
@@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ static void unkeep_all_packs(void)
 
 	for (k = 0; k < pack_id; k++) {
 		struct packed_git *p = all_packs[k];
-		odb_pack_name(p->repo, &name, p->hash, "keep");
+		pack_hashfile(p, &name, "keep");
 		unlink_or_warn(name.buf);
 	}
 	strbuf_release(&name);
diff --git a/builtin/pack-redundant.c b/builtin/pack-redundant.c
index 7d6c47ffd9..d3b5e7e112 100644
--- a/builtin/pack-redundant.c
+++ b/builtin/pack-redundant.c
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ int cmd_pack_redundant(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix UNUSED, s
 	pl = red = pack_list_difference(local_packs, min);
 	while (pl) {
 		printf("%s\n%s\n",
-		       odb_pack_name(repo, &idx_name, pl->pack->hash, "idx"),
+		       pack_hashfile(pl->pack, &idx_name, "idx"),
 		       pl->pack->pack_name);
 		pl = pl->next;
G 	}
diff --git a/packfile.c b/packfile.c
index cfbfcdc2b8..d81a62eb84 100644
--- a/packfile.c
+++ b/packfile.c
@@ -46,6 +46,11 @@ char *odb_pack_name(struct repository *repo, struct strbuf *buf,
 	return buf->buf;
 }
 
+char *pack_hashfile(struct packed_git *p, struct strbuf *out, const char *ext)
+{
+	return odb_pack_name(p->repo, out, p->hash, ext);
+}
+
 static unsigned int pack_used_ctr;
 static unsigned int pack_mmap_calls;
 static unsigned int peak_pack_open_windows;
diff --git a/packfile.h b/packfile.h
index 3409aef35d..43c19d7bba 100644
--- a/packfile.h
+++ b/packfile.h
@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ struct pack_entry {
 char *odb_pack_name(struct repository *repo, struct strbuf *buf,
 		    const unsigned char *hash, const char *ext);
 
+/* Like odb_pack_name(), but pull repo and hash from existing packed_git. */
+char *pack_hashfile(struct packed_git *p, struct strbuf *out, const char *ext);
+
 /*
  * Return the basename of the packfile, omitting any containing directory
  * (e.g., "pack-1234abcd[...].pack").


While coming up with the name, though, I had some second thoughts. The
interface implies that its the way you should derive a pack-related
filename from a packed_git. But it really is mis-designed for that
purpose! The packed_git struct has "foo.pack" or similar in its
pack_name field, and the correct way to derive the .idx, .bitmap, .keep,
etc, is by string substitution. While we do tend to name packs
pack-$hash.pack, most of the code will happily work on
"some-arbitrary-name.pack". And that's why we have so few
odb_pack_name() calls in the first place.

IMHO the ones in fast-import should probably be doing that suffix
replacement instead (and probably we should have a decent helper to
facilitate that; you can grep for strip_suffix.*pack to see places that
could potentially use it).

All that said, I don't think it's worth derailing your series to deal
with that cleanup. That can come later if we want. And if we do that,
then the pack_hashfile() I suggested above would have no callers,
because it's the wrong approach.

I do think it's probably worth changing your series to use the
packed_git repo pointers we already have available, though (i.e., the
cases I pointed out inline above).

-Peff




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux