Re: git diff woes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx> writes:
> I notice it, and I don't like it. I guess I'm just used to git being
> smarter than their GNU tool equivalents, especially since it only ever
> applies patches in full.

It's not at all obvious that this behavior is actually wrong -- it seems
perfectly reasonable to use either old or new text for the hunk headers.

It hardly matters really, since that particular output is just "useful
noise" to provide a bit of helpful context for human readers, and humans
(unlike programs) are notoriously good at not being bothered by such
things.  Er, well most humans anyway.

-Miles

-- 
Americans are broad-minded people.  They'll accept the fact that a person can
be an alcoholic, a dope fiend, a wife beater, and even a newspaperman, but if a
man doesn't drive, there is something wrong with him.  -- Art Buchwald
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux