[no subject]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> > Project Timeline:
> >
> > Community Bonding (Present - November 26):
> >
> > Continue making contributions to the Git codebase working on different
> > things within my capacity and getting more familiar with the codebase,
> > participating in patches review.
> >
> > Conversion of tests begins (December 9 - December 23): Familiarize me
> > with the conversion process to further enhance my understanding,
> > identify files for conversion and start the conversion process, and
> > set up a blog for weekly updates on my conversion process.
>
> Makes sense.
>
> > Implementation of community and mentor reviews (December 27 - January 31):
> >
> > Continue with conversions while testing converted tests, communicating
> > with reviewers and implementing reviews.
> >
> > Testing (February 1 - March 1): Continuously determine the correctness
> > of the converted tests by continuously testing and also liaising with
> > mentors constantly.
>
> For this one here'd I'd recommend to start more iteratively. What you
> have here sounds a bit like a waterfall model, where you first convert
> all tests and then eventually test and send things over to the mailing
> list.
>
> In the Git community you will likely have more success if you work in
> smaller patches. E.g. pick a small set of tests to convert, convert
> them, polish the series and then send it to the mailing list. That cycle
> would then repeat several times until you have converted all of the
> tests.

Yes, my contributions have made me understand this process.
I will make appropriate adjustments. Thank you
>
> > Availability:
> >
> >  I am not currently enrolled in any academic program or have any jobs,
> > and will be available to work on the project for a minimum of 45 hours
> > per week.
>
> You really shouldn't be working more than 40 hours per week ;) The
> [Outreachy Internship Guide](https://www.outreachy.org/docs/internship/)
> recommends 30 hours per week, and I don't expect any more of you,
> either.

>
> Other than that this document looks good to me, thanks!
>
> Patrick

Thank you very much Patrick, I appreciate your time. Please I will
also like to know if i should send the corrected proposal
as a mail to the list as I did with this first version.

Thanks again for your time.
Abraham Samuel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux