On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 05:50:17PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Surely all of _1(), _helper(), _recursive() are meaningless. If we > were to replace existing uses of them, the replacement has to be 10x > better. Well put. Each of the three are more or less equally meaningless, but _1() is an accepted (?) project convention and has the fewest characters, so I think is a good choice personally. > Having said all that, as an aspirational goal, I think it is good to > encourage people to find a name that is descriptive when writing a > new function. I'd refrain from judging if it is way too obvious to > be worth documenting (as I am officially on vacation and shouldn't > be thinking too much about the project). Yeah, go back to vacation ;-). Thanks, Taylor
