Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] ref: check the full refname instead of basename

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 10:38:02AM -0500, karthik nayak wrote:
> shejialuo <shejialuo@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > diff --git a/t/t0602-reffiles-fsck.sh b/t/t0602-reffiles-fsck.sh
> > index 71a4d1a5ae..0aee377439 100755
> > --- a/t/t0602-reffiles-fsck.sh
> > +++ b/t/t0602-reffiles-fsck.sh
> > @@ -25,6 +25,13 @@ test_expect_success 'ref name should be checked' '
> >  	git tag tag-2 &&
> >  	git tag multi_hierarchy/tag-2 &&
> >
> > +	cp $branch_dir_prefix/branch-1 $branch_dir_prefix/@ &&
> > +	git refs verify 2>err &&
> > +	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
> > +	EOF
> > +	test_must_be_empty err &&
> > +	rm $branch_dir_prefix/@ &&
> > +
> >  	cp $branch_dir_prefix/branch-1 $branch_dir_prefix/.branch-1 &&
> >  	test_must_fail git refs verify 2>err &&
> >  	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
> > @@ -33,20 +40,20 @@ test_expect_success 'ref name should be checked' '
> >  	rm $branch_dir_prefix/.branch-1 &&
> >  	test_cmp expect err &&
> >
> > -	cp $branch_dir_prefix/branch-1 $branch_dir_prefix/@ &&
> > +	cp $branch_dir_prefix/branch-1 $branch_dir_prefix/'\'' branch-1'\'' &&
> 
> Nit: Here and below we could use ${SQ} instead.
> 

I agree.

> [snip]






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux