On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 03:19:34PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > (This is all assuming that we are dealing with a uclibc with disabled > features in the first place. I don't think we've seen an answer to > Patrick's questions about why the #error is not triggering). Ah, nevermind, I just saw his response from this morning about the stub header. So I think we do know that this is a tweaked uclibc build. -Peff
