On Sun, Oct 20, 2024, at 13:13, karthik nayak wrote: > kristofferhaugsbakk@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: >> […] >> Such a safety warning is also much less relevant now, considering that >> everyone who isn’t intentionally poking at the internal implementation >> is using porcelain commands to manage `HEAD`. >> >> […] > > In the new reftable backend, HEAD would simply exist as a placeholder. > So either we do as you did and remove this entirely or double down to > say that writing to HEAD directly is not supported. I don't have a > preference here, so this looks good! I see now that I misread you. I thought you were talking about the commit message. But you’re talking about the doc text. I don’t think that this text needs to say that writing to `HEAD` is not supported. Now the doc has implied that writing to `HEAD` is an option since 2005. But I think that implication has been irrelevant for a long time. We’re far away from the time when people had to update `HEAD` manually. -- Kristoffer Haugsbakk
