Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Matthieu Moy wrote: > >> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Jan Wielemaker wrote: >> > >> >> I found out that cloning a empty bare repository produces nothing at >> >> all, [...] >> > >> > If they are empty, what exactly do you mean to clone? >> >> I'd expect an empty repository, with the git remote configured >> correctly. > > Yeah, right. > > Last time I checked, those geneticists did not clone thin air. They > always waited until they had something to clone. >> >> a empty bare repository produces nothing at >> >> all, [...] >> > >> > If they are empty, what exactly do you mean to clone? >> >> I'd expect an empty repository, with the git remote configured >> correctly. > > Yeah, right. > > Last time I checked, those geneticists did not clone thin air. They > always waited until they had something to clone. git-init does not perform sexual intercourse, either. I don't see why geneticists should be relevant for determining what git-clone does. -- David Kastrup - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
