Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] reftable: stop using `struct strbuf`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] reftable: stop using `struct strbuf`
From: Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 17:00:43 -0400
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Edward Thomson <ethomson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, karthik nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx>, shejialuo <shejialuo@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <cover.1729140565.git.ps@pks.im>
References: <cover.1728629612.git.ps@pks.im> <cover.1729140565.git.ps@pks.im>

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 06:53:42AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> Range-diff against v2:

The range-diff looks like we're getting close here, or are already
there. Do others agree that this is ready to start merging down?

Thanks,
Taylor

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] reftable: stop using `struct strbuf`
  - From: karthik nayak

References:
- [PATCH 00/10] reftable: stop using `struct strbuf`
  - From: Patrick Steinhardt
- [PATCH v3 00/10] reftable: stop using `struct strbuf`
  - From: Patrick Steinhardt

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] reftable/basics: provide new `reftable_buf` interface
Next by Date: Seeking your thoughts on LLM-generated contributions
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3 10/10] reftable: handle trivial `reftable_buf` errors
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] reftable: stop using `struct strbuf`
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux